829
AI-generated code contains more bugs and errors than human output (www.techradar.com)
submitted 10 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
204 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 83 points 10 months ago* (8 children)

To be fair most humans don't scrutinize themselves either.

(Fuck AI though. Planet burning trash)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 25 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    The number of times I have received an un-proofread two sentence email is too damn high.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    And then the follow up email because they didn’t actually finish a complete thought

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    I do this with texts/DMs, but I'd never do that with an email. I double or triple check everything, make sure my formatting is good, and that the email itself is complete. I'll DM someone 4 or 5 times in 30 seconds though, it feels like a completely different medium ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    (Fuck AI though. Planet burning trash)

    It's humans burning the planet, not the spicy Linear Algebra.

    Blaming AI for burning the planet is like blaming crack for robbing your house.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago

    Blaming AI is in general criticising everything encompassing it, which includes how bad data centers are for the environment. It's like also recognizing that the crack the crackhead smoked before robbing your house is also bad.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    How about I blame the humans that use and promote AI. The humans that defend it in arguments using stupid analogies to soften the damage it causes?

    Would that make more sense?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •