"This giant bubble on the island of Sardinia holds 2,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide. But the gas wasn’t captured from factory emissions, nor was it pulled from the air. It came from a gas supplier.... "The facility compresses and expands CO2 daily in its closed system, turning a turbine that generates 200 megawatt-hours of electricity, or 20 MW over 10 hours."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 41 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Could be very high, even the waste heat from the compression could be used to achieve more compression and turbines get to above 90%, that all depends on the scales they're building this at. 70% overall doesn't seem unrealistic as an educated guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    On their website (energydome.com) they claim “75%+” round trip efficiency, so not a bad guess!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    That’s a hell of a lot better than most other systems. If true, and if scalable, this is a huge innovation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    compressors, turbines (like steam turbines), piping, some of which heat-resistant (500C), container for liquid carbon dioxide, lots of plastic for the bubble, something for thermal storage, dry and clean carbon dioxide, these aren't unusual or restricted resources, don't depend on critical raw materials or anything like that

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago*

    I was just about to bang out that they must lose a lot of heat from the compression. But apparently not! That’s amazing.

    I’m struggling to think of systems that would significantly outperform “75%+”. Chilled superconducting coils? Those are expensive, and would fail rather catastrophically.

  • source
  • parent