you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 63 points 10 months ago (6 children)

They didn’t redact the names of “Politically Exposed Individuals”, they redacted the name of one Politically Exposed Individual

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 57 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 37 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    They definitely didn't redact Bill Clinton: he features prominently in this first tiny slice of documents. Almost like they've cherry picked docs that would be worst for Dems while protecting their friends.

    How do you do the shocked Pikachu emoji?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    True, but only one that has the power to order the redactions. I guarantee the full exposure would cross party lines but if one particular person is exposed in your little group of paedophiles, every one is safe. If there is no damage, even splash damage, you’re safe If you oppose that person though, and there is no harm to them, your name will be forever associated with the Epstein files

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago*

    I'm working under the assumption that anything that is blacked out directly implicates Trump. If there's a photo somewhere of a large woman in a dress with a blacked out face, that's Trump in drag. The grand jury exposition is literally just Trump's name repeated over and over again.

    I invite them to prove me wrong

  • source
  • parent