you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

100 times faster than 5090 ? While also being more efficient?

This thing need deeeper dive, sound too good to be true.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    That would be the A100, not the 5090.

    From what I can gather, the catch is that this is optical computing, which is up there with quantum computing as things that would be pretty great but good luck making it feasible, let alone mass produce it. You're not putting one in your home PC anytime soon, but hey, technology moves fast.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    It's like saying silicon chips being orders of magnitude faster than vacuum tubes sounds too good to be true. Different substrate will have fundamentally different properties from silicon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments