you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 10 months ago (9 children)

Story title is clickbait. Read this (short) Wikipedia article to get a quick summary

tl;dr the privacy tool in question mixes cryptocurrency funds with other users funds and hence the US government alleged this was a money laundering service

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 10 months ago (8 children)

    How is that clickbait, that's exactly what happened?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    The title could have given more context. I’m not saying there is anything false or misleading, but as written the title is clickbait since you have to click through to get the key facts such as “Privacy app author convicted of facilitating money laundering for Samouri Wallet”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 10 months ago*

    I wouldn't say that not going with an overly descriptive title classifies a bait. You can always add more context but that's what the actual article/video is for, a title is just a brief general description to catch the readers attention. Something like "Interview with Keonne Rodriguez, the founder of Samurai Wallet - a privacy focused bitcoin wallet who's going to prison after being compelled to pleading guilty to running an unlicenced money transmitting business." is very descriptive but doesn't make a great title IMO. It's like saying that "Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone" is a readbait because calling it "A Wizard Orphan and a Magic Rock" would give more context.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [+] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] [S] 6 points 10 months ago

    He is being penalized because of the privacy part, the prosecution argued that the sole purpose of and the intent behind the samurai wallet was money laundering (which he's not actually being charged for nor was he ever. He was charged with a conspiracy to commit money laundering until that particular charge was dropped as a part of a plea deal) because he knew that it can be used by criminals. So he's essentially being prosecuted for writing code that other people allegedly used to commit crimes, an equivalent of tor devs and relay operators being charged with a conspiracy to distribute CSAM and facilitate trade of illegal substances. He never held or controlled any funds yet he's been charged for running an unlicensed money transmitting business despite finCEN explicitly stating that what he was doing did not qualify as transmitting money.

    I can't explain this nearly as well as the video does so please just watch if you have the time, it's really interesting and there's a lot of crazy, outrageous legal fuckery that the prosecution pulled. It's worth a watch.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)