▲ 80 ▼ "New theory proposes time has three dimensions, with space as a secondary effect" -- now you get three detentions for being late to high school science class (phys.org) submitted 1 year ago by TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com to c/science@lemmy.world 23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) I'm not seeing this editor's note (at least on mobile). Where is it ? Edit 2: never mind, found it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) It’s at the very end of the (desktop) article, immediately following the paragraph "The path to unification might require fundamentally reconsidering the nature of physical reality itself," he said. "This theory demonstrates how viewing time as three-dimensional can naturally resolve multiple physics puzzles through a single coherent mathematical framework." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Found it thanks Why did they burry what's arguably the most important piece of information at the very end though ? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) The “editor’s note” indicates that it’s not part of the original article—it would be misleading to insert it in the middle of the article if it wasn’t written by the attributed author. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr 1 point 1 year ago How about putting it at the top of the article, or using the dedicated "editor's note" button they put right below the title ? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) It’s at the very end of the (desktop) article, immediately following the paragraph "The path to unification might require fundamentally reconsidering the nature of physical reality itself," he said. "This theory demonstrates how viewing time as three-dimensional can naturally resolve multiple physics puzzles through a single coherent mathematical framework." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Found it thanks Why did they burry what's arguably the most important piece of information at the very end though ? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) The “editor’s note” indicates that it’s not part of the original article—it would be misleading to insert it in the middle of the article if it wasn’t written by the attributed author. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr 1 point 1 year ago How about putting it at the top of the article, or using the dedicated "editor's note" button they put right below the title ? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Found it thanks Why did they burry what's arguably the most important piece of information at the very end though ? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) The “editor’s note” indicates that it’s not part of the original article—it would be misleading to insert it in the middle of the article if it wasn’t written by the attributed author. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr 1 point 1 year ago How about putting it at the top of the article, or using the dedicated "editor's note" button they put right below the title ? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) The “editor’s note” indicates that it’s not part of the original article—it would be misleading to insert it in the middle of the article if it wasn’t written by the attributed author. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr 1 point 1 year ago How about putting it at the top of the article, or using the dedicated "editor's note" button they put right below the title ? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr 1 point 1 year ago How about putting it at the top of the article, or using the dedicated "editor's note" button they put right below the title ? permalink fedilink source parent