Our long history of violating international law continues...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Have you ever heard of privateers

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Yes. And those are privately owned vessels acting under a government's letter of marque. Private, it's in the name. :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Yes but some else just told me they are warships so it's not piracy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Warships are by definition owned and operated by a government. Privateers are private vessels operating under cover of law by a government.

    So, yeah? Warships cannot commit piracy, technically. Really, the whole conversation here is about words and meanings.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago*

    Yes I have. Privateers are private individuals that commit piracy on behalf of the state.

    The US did not hire or sanction a mercenary group to take this tanker.

    The US used its military. That makes it not piracy, but that does make it an act of war

  • source
  • parent