this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025

549 points (99.3% liked)

Funny

funny@sh.itjust.works

16,753 readers

3,840 active

917 users here now

General rules:

Be kind.
All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 3 years ago

moderators

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works

example@reddthat.com

VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works

So 5 stars then (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 11 months ago by Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/funny@sh.itjust.works

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

I can also infer the wrong conclusion from the same data… which is why I misread Agnew’s response at first.

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] alci@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

Maybe the lawyer lost the case. The response is even more brilliant in this case !!

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 point 11 months ago*

🤣
That type of ambiguity is fine.
It's the “who actually wrote this: the client, a relative, or an opponent?” that confuzzled not just me.

parent