this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2025

5 points (55.3% liked)

Programming

programming@programming.dev

29,171 readers

2,792 active

28 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 3 years ago

moderators

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

UlrikHD@programming.dev

bugsmith@programming.dev

Spyro@programming.dev

Ruby Is Not a Serious Programming Language (www.wired.com)

submitted 11 months ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/programming@programming.dev

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Ruby survives on affection, not utility. Let's move on.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20251204034843/https://www.wired.com/story/ruby-is-not-a-serious-programming-language/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

No problem with 3rd-party scripts and frames blocked.

Seriously, this lets me read more articles than with only adblocking.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 2 points 11 months ago

Huh. The thing is, I do block 3rd party scripts and frames by default (umatrix).

parent