Like even a little description?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

I've never looked at the code base and I could make a reasonable guess as to what it's about. I'm guessing it has to do with pasting a fediverse link into a post and making it point to the actual instance instead of the federated link.

I could be wrong but it looks like it would make sense to the maintainers of the code.

Or am I just missing a joke here?

Edit: sorry if this comes across dickish. I don't have context for the question. It looks frankly like a very efficient use of words β€” I'm a little bit in awe. Take away one word and it would be gibberish to me. My own commit messages are not nearly as efficient.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    The fact that you're asking proves the description is bad. URLs? "Fixed: when a URL is passed to AAA, BBB should be CCC, but it is DDD instead". "Stupid* descriptive commit messages are unbeatable. You might as well copy the whole bug description if it's not super long and was formulated by a person used to describe things (so, any good QA)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

    I think the description is sufficient. As long as the dev and contributors know what it’s referring to. Isn’t this app mostly worked on by one person? I think people complaining about short action descriptions or calling them stupid is a bit excessive. Unless both you and the OP are looking to contribute?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments