Swiss voters on Sunday decisively rejected a call to require women to do national service in the military, civil protection teams or other forms, as all men must do already.

Official results. with counting still ongoing in some areas after a referendum, showed that more than half of Switzerland’s cantons, or states, had rejected the “citizen service initiative” by wide margins. That meant it was defeated, because proposals need a majority of both voters and cantons to pass.

Voters also heavily rejected a separate proposal to impose a new national tax on individual donations or inheritances of more than 50 million francs ($62 million), with the revenues to be used to fight the impact of climate change and help Switzerland meet its ambitions to have net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 42 points 11 months ago (15 children)

Insane that any democracy would reject an inheritance tax

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    the problem how i understood is, that we are not only talking about cash money but also money that is in businesses. family owned businesess may then be forced to sell their business to shareholder owned foreign corpos, because they could not afford it due to the tax. that sparked some major fear among voters. the result was not even close, it was 78% No! thats hughe and beyond any left/right worldview, not a single canton voted yes, that alone is a clear indicator that this bill was not very well-thought-out

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago* (2 children)

    Not that insane. Most people only concern themselves with their own issues. And if you're a 40 year old whose childhood home is now worth 500k or whatever and you have to pay 200k in taxes in order to inherit it, then you probably want to vote against it because otherwise the government will take it.

    Okay, take all that with a grain of salt because I'm not too familiar with inheritance law, but it's based on multiple similar stories I've heard from people.

    I still think it should be taxed, don't get me wrong. But I understand why people are against it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    with the revenues to be used to fight the impact of climate change and help Switzerland meet its ambitions to have net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.

    Maybe the people wanted to have actual social services provided to them instead of climate action.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -11 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    Because it is theft. If my parents are successful and pay their taxes why is it fair to double tax a child’s inheritance. You tax earnings and income. You don’t the same money multiple times.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    It's more important to prevent an aristocracy than it is to be fair.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    Those things aren’t mutually exclusive. You can be fair as well as tax the rich.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    Over 60 Million dollars is a lot of money. More money than your kid needs to live comfortably and never have to work ever again. That's so much money you are creating a family that never has to experience the life of a normal person and can use that money to influence politics to compound that effect.

    How much money does a person need to live comfortably without having to contribute labor? 2-5 million? Is living in luxury but not so much that someone who's never had a real job can just buy elections unfair?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    You are presenting issues that are irrelevant to the tax. Yes those things you mentioned are unfair and should be regulated accordingly. Those are irrelevant to an inheritance tax. If you want to create a wealth tax over a certain amount that’s fine but call a spade a spade. Don’t hide it as inheritance tax and allow wealthy people to hide their money in other ways like trusts and businesses.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Thing is the same money does regularly get taxed multiple times. You get shafted on money as it comes to you (income tax) and u get shafted on that money once you spend it to (sales tax). Hell I bought a house and will get to pay taxes on that annually for as long as I own it, despite already paying my state and fed govt taxes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    Just because everyone is getting fucked doesn’t mean it’s right. Double taxing only hurts the poor because they can’t hide money in tax free investments or businesses that they use to write off expenses.

  • source
  • parent