you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

I mean, it sounds like it's gonna be a fairly large codebase. Rust is definitely better equipped for large codebases than Python...

I do agree that Python could give them more outside contributors, but from my experience, I don't think it's worth swaying from your preferred tooling for that. Outside contributions will make up barely a fraction of code changes either way, so you should rather ensure that your core team is productive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Python can also be used for large codebases (thanks uv), but I agree that Rust is better suited to the job.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Are you referring to the workspace feature of uv? Is that working well?

    Management might want us to revive a project from a few years ago, which is like 5% Python, but for which we had to build a homegrown horrid implementation of workspace builds, using shell scripts and symlinks. We'd definitely want to get rid of that, if uv's workspace builds work at all, really. 🫠

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment