you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 11 months ago (7 children)

No thanks, double-NATing is not my idea of fun when it comes to self-hosting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    That is a silly assumption, like why would you assume the worst possible setup? And it would be much easier to talk to the person managing the apartment internet than having to deal with some AI chatbot that pretends to be the support at some shitty ISP.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (4 children)

    apartment landlord

    why would you assume the worst possible setup?

    (/¯ ಠ_ಠ)/¯

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Many apartments are owned by the inhabitants or are cooperatively managed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    This. Though theoretically you could do it without CGNAT, maybe some type of complex vlan arrangement? I'm not sure, I'm not a networkologist.

    I do know that I just got fiber down my road from a smaller company, still a big multi state company, but not Comcast or charter big. I called them because I was worried about CGNAT for my self hosting. The salesman didn't know what I was talking about, which is disappointing but not surprising. But they forwarded me to the tech guys, who also claimed to not know what I was talking about... Which was either a downright lie, or they were idiots, either way it's very concerning.

    The price was right though, $5 cheaper per month, for 10 times faster download, and 30 times faster upload. So I gave it a shot. Thankfully I'm not behind a CGNAT, yet 🤞

  • source
  • parent