you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 132 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Isn’t this exactly the type of situation that was being used recently as an example of when an order is so blatantly illegal that the soldier is required not to follow it?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 17 points 11 months ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    Because it comes down to the Presidential pardon powers. They can defy a blatantly illegal order, be dishonorably discharged, lose their pensions, healthcare benefits, pay, etc. or, they can follow a blatantly illegal order, and receive a pardon for it later.

    I ask you, which one would you pick?

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-2 replies)