you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 11 months ago (9 children)

AppImage isn't like an exe in Windows. It's much more like a App Bundle in MacOS. Way way better than just an .exe

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    AppImage is still kinda trash though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    I begrudgingly prefer AppImage to being told to make make install, at this point. You know those little projects that will never go into a standard repo or flatpak. For example, some ham radios used a converter box that hooked up to a Windows 95 PC via serial so you could program its internal memory. Well, none of that shit exists anymore. so some guy somewhere has written a thing to do it with a Raspberry Pi's GPIO. 444 people in the world will ever download and use this software. I'd rather you AppImage that than tell me to git clone make make install.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (4 children)

    I'm not familiar with app bundles, and tbh my only experience with exe's are the kind that are just zip files with a different extension. I'd assumed that under the hood they were similar, but I guess I never actually checked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    There are virtually no .exes that are zip files with another extensionm. They are executable binary files and nearly always require a slew of support files (just like Linux binary executables)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    Is that not common anymore? I remember back in the day I'd commonly end up with installers that were just self exteacting archives with a little extra. Idk I haven't used windows basically at all in at least a decade

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments