▲ 190 ▼ Judge backs AI firm over use of copyrighted books (www.bbc.com) submitted 1 year ago by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 59 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago (4 children) How exactly does this benefit "us" ? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) Because books are used to train both commercial and open source language models? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (2 children) used to train both commercial commercial training is, in this case, stealing people's work for commercial gain and open source language models so, uh, let us train open-source models on open-source text. There's so much of it that there's no need to steal. ? I'm not sure why you added a question mark at the end of your statement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) I'm not sure why you added a question mark at the end of your statement. I was questioning whether or not you would see that as a benefit. Clearly you don't. Are you also against libraries letting people borrow books since those are also lost sales for the authors, or are you just a luddite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago libraries letting people borrow books This is so far from analogous that it's almost a nonsequitur. are you just a luddite? No, and you don't even believe such nonsense. You're grasping, ineffectively. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) Because books are used to train both commercial and open source language models? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (2 children) used to train both commercial commercial training is, in this case, stealing people's work for commercial gain and open source language models so, uh, let us train open-source models on open-source text. There's so much of it that there's no need to steal. ? I'm not sure why you added a question mark at the end of your statement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) I'm not sure why you added a question mark at the end of your statement. I was questioning whether or not you would see that as a benefit. Clearly you don't. Are you also against libraries letting people borrow books since those are also lost sales for the authors, or are you just a luddite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago libraries letting people borrow books This is so far from analogous that it's almost a nonsequitur. are you just a luddite? No, and you don't even believe such nonsense. You're grasping, ineffectively. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (2 children) used to train both commercial commercial training is, in this case, stealing people's work for commercial gain and open source language models so, uh, let us train open-source models on open-source text. There's so much of it that there's no need to steal. ? I'm not sure why you added a question mark at the end of your statement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) I'm not sure why you added a question mark at the end of your statement. I was questioning whether or not you would see that as a benefit. Clearly you don't. Are you also against libraries letting people borrow books since those are also lost sales for the authors, or are you just a luddite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago libraries letting people borrow books This is so far from analogous that it's almost a nonsequitur. are you just a luddite? No, and you don't even believe such nonsense. You're grasping, ineffectively. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) I'm not sure why you added a question mark at the end of your statement. I was questioning whether or not you would see that as a benefit. Clearly you don't. Are you also against libraries letting people borrow books since those are also lost sales for the authors, or are you just a luddite? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago libraries letting people borrow books This is so far from analogous that it's almost a nonsequitur. are you just a luddite? No, and you don't even believe such nonsense. You're grasping, ineffectively. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago libraries letting people borrow books This is so far from analogous that it's almost a nonsequitur. are you just a luddite? No, and you don't even believe such nonsense. You're grasping, ineffectively. permalink fedilink source parent