▲ 387 ▼ I wasted all my generational luck for this (files.catbox.moe) submitted 11 months ago by mudkip@lemdro.id to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev 32 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 11 months ago (3 children) Without chicanery? Yes Without luck? No permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] afk_strats@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children) I think this is beyond luck. This is astronomical. It's orders of magnitude beyond what is lucky for our entire civilization to have produced in its entire existence permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 17 points 11 months ago (1 child) I'd put it down to a shit library or pseudorandomness before something happening that's so lucky it functionally should never happen. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* Agreed. Most likely a bad implementation. For example, if the browser does time fuzzing, this could make the UUID less random. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] afk_strats@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children) I think this is beyond luck. This is astronomical. It's orders of magnitude beyond what is lucky for our entire civilization to have produced in its entire existence permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 17 points 11 months ago (1 child) I'd put it down to a shit library or pseudorandomness before something happening that's so lucky it functionally should never happen. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* Agreed. Most likely a bad implementation. For example, if the browser does time fuzzing, this could make the UUID less random. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 17 points 11 months ago (1 child) I'd put it down to a shit library or pseudorandomness before something happening that's so lucky it functionally should never happen. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* Agreed. Most likely a bad implementation. For example, if the browser does time fuzzing, this could make the UUID less random. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* Agreed. Most likely a bad implementation. For example, if the browser does time fuzzing, this could make the UUID less random. permalink fedilink source parent
