you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 1 year ago* (15 children)

I said literally: it means absolutely nothing historically or ethically, or worse it typically means "aligned with imperialist hegemons".

Do I need to explain to you what that means, or do you have a clue about South Korean history and US foreign policy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (12 children)

    But what then does it mean, or rather should it mean according to you? So far you've only cast confusion on what the question means, but you haven't provided your view on what it should mean then.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago* (11 children)

    There's two issues. The one is that prosperity is already very ambiguous, and in the context of nations we usually default to easily measurable things like GDP. This doesn't define human well-being which is actually not so easy to measure. Look at the US as the richest nation on earth for a stark example. The question was asked in this way and without this clarification for a reason.

    But the bigger issue is that it's just the wrong question to ask. Any definition of prosperity for one massive people can be built upon the cruel subjugation and exploitation of others. And that's exactly what happened and continues to happen under the "former" global colonial powers, as well as aligned governments (which includes a lot of puppets). Hence US foreign policy. Celebrating this as a victory of capitalism is either clueless or outright malicious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    If you don't feel like stating your opinion on which country is better off and why, then you could just say that outright or say nothing. You really don't have to go to all of this trouble to pontificate about how it is unreasonable to even consider the matter. 😜

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    So prosperity for one people is worth any price to you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I will take from your attempt to throw a "Gotchya!" at me that you acknowledge that you are unwilling to state your own opinion on the matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    The question itself was a cheap gotcha. Shockingly, it's not as simple as that as I've been pointing out. Which you'd acknowledge if you were arguing in good faith.

    It's unfortunate that any attempt to insert some nuance automatically makes me the enemy in your simplistic position on the matter. And now ego prevents you from backing off of this kind of thinking by any means, no matter what toxic and regressive conclusions it takes you to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (8 replies)