85
Is the FOSS world in danger of a corporate takeover, thanks to pushover licenses? (libretechni.ca)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/linux@programming.dev
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I ask this because I think of the recent switch of Ubuntu to the Rust recode of the GNU core utils, which use an MIT license. There are many Rust recodes of GPL software that re-license it as a pushover MIT or Apache licenses. I worry these relicensing efforts this will significantly harm the FOSS ecosystem. Is this reason to start worrying or is it not that bad?

IMO, if the FOSS world makes something public, with extensive liberties, then the only thing that should be asked in return is that people preserve these liberties, like the GPL successfully enforces. These pushover licenses preserve nothing.

OQB @ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

Imagine having to pay for each library your computer uses. We'd just as soon stop using computers than do that.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    Imagine paying for Windows

    I used an Open Source library for work.
    I asked my company to consider donating to them.
    Nothing...

    They'd rather pay for MS Teams even when it doesn't work reliably.
    I offered to help with setting up a WebRTC server.
    Nothing...

    The only ones actually caring about donating to FOSS projects are a few of the developers, that realise the effort that goes into it and also have enough money to spare.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I wonder if a dual-licensed non-commercial + paid commercial approach could work, but from my experience with FOSS developers, they tend to view non-commercial licenses as sacrilege...

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Well yeah, that's not really FOSS, right?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    In their eyes, probably not... but you can't have it both ways. Either you let companies take advantage of you, or you don't...

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    From what I see, there's not much that can be done over here.
    You either use GPL Licensing and then look for other ways to get money (because only FOSS people will pay you when they don't have to and there aren't many of them, as compared to the population) or you use a non-FOSS license and eventually get bought by a corporate entity to get money, then get your project enshittified.

    Of course, you can say that you won't do that, but after how many of them have gone back on similar claims, it can be hard to get others to trust you.
    Also, if (when) your project starts getting in the way of large corporations and their money and they realise you don't sellout, you can expect them to start coming after your livelihood. And how many people do you think, would play chicken with them?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent