Archive article https://archive.ph/woX7H

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 75 points 11 months ago (6 children)

What's implied here, is, that there is direct evidence of trump having sex with minors. And enough people obviously know that it's release is inevitable, they're doing this tired labor of trying to redefine what a pedophile is or isn't.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago

    As was predicted.

    Nothing will happen now that pedophiles run the world. This is literally a return to norm.

    This whole child rape thing is a new concept that came about when we let women vote.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (3 children)

    Yep, we got it, pretty clear.

    Just say "evidence of Trump raping children", though. Your "having sex with minors" suuure sounds like the minimizing, deliberate lying (to hide extreme harm) that all the fuckin rags do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    More pedantic phrasing still doesn't change the fact that he committed serious crimes. I guess now they'll try to retroactively change the age of consent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Apologies if I'm misinterpreting you here, but I do not find the distinction between "had sex with minors" and "raped children" to be merely pedantic.

    One of those is phrased as a consensual interaction, carrying water for the worst among us by glossing over the inherent violence, manipulation, coercion - the other one tells the truth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment