1243
Breaking: Google is easing up on Android's new sideloading restrictions! (www.androidauthority.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
242 comments fedilink hide all child comments
:redstar: 1
 

Google: "Based on this feedback and our ongoing conversations with the community, we are building a new advanced flow that allows experienced users to accept the risks of installing software that isn't verified. We are designing this flow specifically to resist coercion, ensuring that users aren't tricked into bypassing these safety checks while under pressure from a scammer. It will also include clear warnings to ensure users fully understand the risks involved, but ultimately, it puts the choice in their hands."

Thank god. I would've ditched Android for good if this went through, and while it sounds like it would be annoying for casual users to enable unverified apps, at least we can still install them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 21 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

We are designing this flow specifically to resist coercion, ensuring that users aren’t tricked into bypassing these safety checks while under pressure from a scammer.

Translation: if they want scamware, it better be from Google Play, where Google gets a 30% cut. On top of the cut they got for the phishing link in Google Ads.

And if anything thinks I'm being hyperbolic, go on Google Play and search for pretty much anything. Or turn off your adblocker.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The fee is 15% below the first $1M of revenue and it should go without saying that app developers only pay that fee for paid apps, in-app purchases or digital subscriptions. It's very unlikely that a scam app would be paid, or work off a subscription, and if those phishing ads are doing their conversions, you'll never see the user again.

    I doubt Google's making more than a few cents off each of these scam apps.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    Google gets a cut from the Google Ads click, which takes the user directly to the Play Store (or, if on desktop, the Chrome extension store).

    If it's some free shovelware app, they get a cut from the ads spammed onto the user's screen. If it’s a sham subscription app, they get a cut of that. I see this a lot test clicking ads these days.

    If its legit phishing, that’s a fair point; they don't get a direct cut of the scam, other than the attention it drives towards their app stores and the data they collect for the user's profile. But the point I’m trying to make is that it’s incredibly hypocritical to paint 3rd party apps (and indeed any competing app store) as a danger when they do such a poor job policing their own store. They may have a point, but it doesn’t really tackle scamware unless they change their moderation habits.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent