He wasn't intersex and didn't necessarily have a small penis (although he did have a 1 in 10 chance), he had this:

Kallmann syndrome is a genetic disorder that prevents a person from starting or fully completing puberty. Kallmann syndrome is a form of a group of conditions termed hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

Regardless:

A. Yes, body shaming of any kind (including dick size) is a pretty shitty tactic to stoop to.

B. I'm sure there are really awesome people with the same disorder, the degree it even causes noticable issues seems like it can vary greatly depending on other factors, and genetic discrimination itself is also a shitty tactic.

However, in the case of the man who literally justified the Holocaust by claiming he was eliminating all inferior genetics for the greater good of his country, I can't feel bad for him, and I think this information should probably be included in all future history books.

At the very least, this information is important to keep in mind anytime fascist assholes start rambling about biology, gender, or race/ethnicity based genetics, and making up bullshit excuses to discriminate against people. For example, if a guy were to ramble about wokeness and fitness standards in the military, and say the U.S. is no longer giving women a "pass" if they can't meet those standards, only for a different video to show the same guy struggling to do a proper pull-up vs a mother with a new born strapped to her chest showing him how it's done, can you really feel bad for this guy if it goes viral and people throw it back at him? I can't do a pull-up either, but I'm also not spreading propaganda on a national stage, that "certain segments of society," just aren't biologically programmed to have the upper body strength required to serve in the military.

It's not that anyone should be shamed or judged based solely on physical or genetic traits, but it proves that even if you're opposed to "wokeness," you really should always be questioning what's being advertised vs what you're actually being sold. It does make me wonder if any of the current pro-eugenics/survival of the fittest/anti woke "lions among sheep" in 2025, would be willing to submit their own personal genomes and epigenomes as public record (for the greater good). Because I feel like there's a really good chance you'd find some surprises hidden throughout their superior code.