“At present, the lede and the overall presentation state, in Wikipedia’s voice, that Israel is committing genocide, although that claim is highly contested,” Wales said. He added that a “neutral approach would begin with a formulation such as: ‘Multiple governments, NGOs, and legal bodies have described or rejected the characterization of Israel’s actions in Gaza as genocide.’” Currently, the article bases its position that a genocide exists on conclusions from United Nations investigations, the International Association of Genocide Scholars, and “multiple human rights groups,” among others.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

https://blog.reputationx.com/wikipedia-alternatives

Edit: I will give you some feedback as to what I thought was ill conceived in your statement.

First, I think beginning with “wrong” and making a subjective statement that is not what Wikipedia or Wikimedia actually have as their mission started you off on the wrong foot.

Second, a minority of actors has not prevented consensus.

Third, the UN does not have to allow war criminals a platform.

  • source
  • parent