While that may be true, I think it’s also generally correct that the information was generally based on objective reality, even if the interpretation was skewed. Now, they are just making up information, and using it to support that narrative they wanted. It’s easier when you can skip objective reality to make up the story you want, and continue to repeat it as indisputable fact

the majority of it was skewed and manipulated to conform to and confirm a very specific set of values, politics and beliefs

That's the nature of human observation and analysis. Everyone brings their own baggage.

The raw data continues to prove useful reference material for anyone looking to independently analyze policy.