you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 18 points 1 year ago (10 children)

400 bucks for that? LEGO is out of their fucking minds, it's worth maybe half that.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    How long did you not look at Lego's pricing? XD

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    You seem to have mistaken greed for value.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    No, I don't think so. Compared to other companies, Lego is massively overpriced and has been for years (and no, Lego does not offer better quality).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    But then I don't get your comment, at least not your second one.

    First, you criticise Lego's pricing, which I extend ("has been for a long time") but then you say I mistake greed for value? I don't get it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    LEGO is being greedy by charging more money than their product is worth. I'm not sure what you don't seem to understand. LEGO wants you to pay 400 dollars for a set that has a value of 200 tops and the actual value likely much less than that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    "Look at all this money. Boy do I have so much money. What will I ever do with this much money?"

    Anyway, this is what I believe our typical customers are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments