you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

That actually sounds like a reasonable response. Driving assist means that a human is supposed to be attentive to take control. If the system detects a situation where it's unable to make a good decision, dumping that decision on the human in control seems like the closest they have to a "fail safe" option. Of course, there should probably also be an understanding that people are stupid and will almost certainly have stopped paying attention a long time ago. So, maybe a "human take the wheel" followed by a "slam the brakes" if no input is detected in 2-3 seconds. While an emergency stop isn't always the right choice, it probably beats leaving a several ton metal object hurtling along uncontrolled in nearly every circumstance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    That actually sounds like a reasonable response.

    If you give the driver enough time to act, which tesla doesn't. They turn it off a second before impact and then claim it wasn't in self-driving mode.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    Not even a second, it's sometimes less than 250-300ms. If I wasn't already anticipating it to fail and disengage as it went though the 2-lane wide turn I would have gone straight into oncoming traffic

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    I don't know if that is still the case, but many electronic stuff in the US had warnings, with pictures, like "don't put it in the bath", and the like .

    People are dumb, and you should take that into account.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)