you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

No, it does not. Saying we might not find x treatment because it didn't work on mice says absolutely nothing about the actual efficacy of testing on mice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    It does if it diverts attention away from other potential cures, not to mention making the animals' sacrifices even more in vain

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    How can we develop therapeutics without animal testing? Genuinely asking your thoughts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'm not the expert but it seems naive to think animal testing is the one and only way. It's just an already established norm with some regions requiring it for eligibility of sale, that's why it's still as prevalent as it is

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment