▲ 684 ▼ Orcs and Uruk-Hai discussing dinner (crazypeople.online) submitted 1 year ago by Secret_Music@crazypeople.online to c/lotrmemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com 99 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com -12 points 1 year ago (18 children) You can't enslave animals. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 18 child comments replies: [–] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (4 children) It's actually pretty easy, many of them barely fight back permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com -10 points 1 year ago (3 children) It's like they know their place. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) It's more like they barely know anything. Like toddlers or something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Toddlers are basically animals, yeah. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago All humans are literally animals but also yes permalink fedilink source parent [–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (12 children) Yeah you can. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) Slavery is the ownership of a person as property, especially in regards to their labour. Wikipedia. Animals are persons nowadays? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children) I don’t need Wikipedia to tell me that animals are persons and not property. Anything that has a conscious perspective has personhood. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I wouldn't say having consciousness is enough to define a person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Why? permalink fedilink source parent [–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 1 point 1 year ago (7 children) no permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Yes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sas@beehaw.org 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Any arguments on why you think that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) They're not people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Where have I heard this argument before permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) are you serious permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago I'm serious insofar as I think that sentient beings absolutely can be enslaved. Am I drawing the parallel to the rhetoric of racist slaveowners in earnest? No. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sas@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago I think you've not spent time around any animal other than human if you think that permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (4 children) It's actually pretty easy, many of them barely fight back permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com -10 points 1 year ago (3 children) It's like they know their place. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) It's more like they barely know anything. Like toddlers or something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Toddlers are basically animals, yeah. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago All humans are literally animals but also yes permalink fedilink source parent
[+] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com -10 points 1 year ago (3 children) It's like they know their place. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) It's more like they barely know anything. Like toddlers or something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Toddlers are basically animals, yeah. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago All humans are literally animals but also yes permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) It's more like they barely know anything. Like toddlers or something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Toddlers are basically animals, yeah. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago All humans are literally animals but also yes permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com -3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Toddlers are basically animals, yeah. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago All humans are literally animals but also yes permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago All humans are literally animals but also yes permalink fedilink source parent
[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (12 children) Yeah you can. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) Slavery is the ownership of a person as property, especially in regards to their labour. Wikipedia. Animals are persons nowadays? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children) I don’t need Wikipedia to tell me that animals are persons and not property. Anything that has a conscious perspective has personhood. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I wouldn't say having consciousness is enough to define a person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Why? permalink fedilink source parent [–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 1 point 1 year ago (7 children) no permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Yes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sas@beehaw.org 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Any arguments on why you think that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) They're not people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Where have I heard this argument before permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) are you serious permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago I'm serious insofar as I think that sentient beings absolutely can be enslaved. Am I drawing the parallel to the rhetoric of racist slaveowners in earnest? No. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sas@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago I think you've not spent time around any animal other than human if you think that permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) Slavery is the ownership of a person as property, especially in regards to their labour. Wikipedia. Animals are persons nowadays? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children) I don’t need Wikipedia to tell me that animals are persons and not property. Anything that has a conscious perspective has personhood. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I wouldn't say having consciousness is enough to define a person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Why? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children) I don’t need Wikipedia to tell me that animals are persons and not property. Anything that has a conscious perspective has personhood. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I wouldn't say having consciousness is enough to define a person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Why? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I wouldn't say having consciousness is enough to define a person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago Why? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 1 point 1 year ago (7 children) no permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Yes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sas@beehaw.org 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Any arguments on why you think that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) They're not people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Where have I heard this argument before permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) are you serious permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago I'm serious insofar as I think that sentient beings absolutely can be enslaved. Am I drawing the parallel to the rhetoric of racist slaveowners in earnest? No. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sas@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago I think you've not spent time around any animal other than human if you think that permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sas@beehaw.org 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) Any arguments on why you think that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) They're not people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Where have I heard this argument before permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) are you serious permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago I'm serious insofar as I think that sentient beings absolutely can be enslaved. Am I drawing the parallel to the rhetoric of racist slaveowners in earnest? No. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sas@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago I think you've not spent time around any animal other than human if you think that permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) They're not people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Where have I heard this argument before permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) are you serious permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago I'm serious insofar as I think that sentient beings absolutely can be enslaved. Am I drawing the parallel to the rhetoric of racist slaveowners in earnest? No. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sas@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago I think you've not spent time around any animal other than human if you think that permalink fedilink source parent
[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Where have I heard this argument before permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) are you serious permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago I'm serious insofar as I think that sentient beings absolutely can be enslaved. Am I drawing the parallel to the rhetoric of racist slaveowners in earnest? No. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) are you serious permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago I'm serious insofar as I think that sentient beings absolutely can be enslaved. Am I drawing the parallel to the rhetoric of racist slaveowners in earnest? No. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago I'm serious insofar as I think that sentient beings absolutely can be enslaved. Am I drawing the parallel to the rhetoric of racist slaveowners in earnest? No. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sas@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago I think you've not spent time around any animal other than human if you think that permalink fedilink source parent