you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 108 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

If we set aside the privacy nightmare, consider this.

Teens wont stop searching for porn. Would you rather they find it on not-moderated sites, that might also consist of illegal content? Or might consists of nudes from people than didnt consent to their picture being online?

Everything is just dumb about this.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    yes you're right but you and I both know they aren't concerned about that because going back to your first sentence that's what this is really about but masked as a "won't anyone think of the children" so it's easier to swallow (no pun intended)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    At least in the EU they will implement a verification system, meaning you only have to verify with the official government, and then you can use a anonymised token that gives the porn sites only the age.

    It's not perfect, but it's far better than everything else suggested.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    the recent California law seems to be better. what it requires is the parent to be able to configure the age for an OS account. browsers can then check the age bracket, and enforce the limit instead of having the website do it.

  • source
  • parent