you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 1 year ago (7 children)

No it is not. It is the same as saying you can't have coal energy production without production of CO2. At most, you can capture that CO2 and do something with it instead of releasing to the atmosphere.

You can have energy production without CO2. Like solar or wind, but that is not coal energy production. It's something else. In order to remove CO2 from coal energy production, we had to switch to different technologies.

In the same way, if you want to not have hallucinations, you should move away from LLMs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Technological impossibilities exist all the time. They're one of, if not the biggest, drivers behind engineering and design.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Let me ask you this

    Take a CPU designed in the last 80 years. Ask it to divide integer 1 by integer 2. Explain to me why the CPU hands back 0 and not 0.5.

    Technical solutions do have fundamental limitations to them that cannot be overcome. That scenario plays out all the time. We didn't overcome integer division by brute force, we acknowledged that the approach of having computers use integers for numbers is flawed and came up with a bunch of possible solutions until finally settling on IEEE754 and even then it still doesn't handle all math correctly.

    Blindly saying such issues can be overcome is, imho, the truly stupid statement

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)