▲ 481 ▼ Apple is reportedly getting ready to introduce ads to its Maps app (www.engadget.com) submitted 1 year ago by tonytins@pawb.social to c/technology@lemmy.world 174 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 6 points 1 year ago (12 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) one of the reasons mobile phone theft is so lucrative, because people are so obliging to keep their entire financial information downloaded to a single device [Citation needed] The most common reason for mobile phone theft is to wipe it and sell it, or just dismantle it for parts. No common thief is going to be trying to break into an iPhone's security system to get to someone's banking data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) Even if they manage to keep the phone unlocked, and even if they manage to get to a safe spot before I am able to lock the device remotely, they still can't access any banking applications because they require the PIN/biometrics to get in, even on an unlocked phone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 year ago Anything is possible with enough time. Which is why you force log-off all your apps and remote-wipe the device if your phone gets stolen. permalink fedilink source parent [–] baatliwala@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago It's amazing how Americans love poking their nose into everyone else's affairs yet can be so oblivious. For some people a phone is literally the only device they have, they can't do anything else. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) How do you deal with 2fa? For capital one in particular, I don't believe there is an option not to use their app, and the other banks that I use are in the same boat or adamantly recommend to use their app. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 year ago* (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Kahizzle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago If their bank is anything like my bank, you NEED to have the mobile app installed to login with for online banking. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children) The standard for banks like capital one is, in order to login in a browser you must use their app 2fa, they do not support third party 2fa methods, and their app doesn't work under compatibility layers. That last part may come with a workaround, but my earlier point is that the normal end user wouldn't feel comfortable using such a thing if it is not officially allowed. They also claim you can use 2fa by SMS, but that is first and foremost wrong since it isn't an option for payment portals, and secondly insecure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago I guess it is a matter of semantics at this point, but i take the year of the Linux phone to be when a phone running a Linux os is viable for the masses, which as my original message states is at least 10 years out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (4 children) one of the reasons mobile phone theft is so lucrative, because people are so obliging to keep their entire financial information downloaded to a single device [Citation needed] The most common reason for mobile phone theft is to wipe it and sell it, or just dismantle it for parts. No common thief is going to be trying to break into an iPhone's security system to get to someone's banking data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) Even if they manage to keep the phone unlocked, and even if they manage to get to a safe spot before I am able to lock the device remotely, they still can't access any banking applications because they require the PIN/biometrics to get in, even on an unlocked phone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 year ago Anything is possible with enough time. Which is why you force log-off all your apps and remote-wipe the device if your phone gets stolen. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) Even if they manage to keep the phone unlocked, and even if they manage to get to a safe spot before I am able to lock the device remotely, they still can't access any banking applications because they require the PIN/biometrics to get in, even on an unlocked phone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 year ago Anything is possible with enough time. Which is why you force log-off all your apps and remote-wipe the device if your phone gets stolen. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (2 children) Even if they manage to keep the phone unlocked, and even if they manage to get to a safe spot before I am able to lock the device remotely, they still can't access any banking applications because they require the PIN/biometrics to get in, even on an unlocked phone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 year ago Anything is possible with enough time. Which is why you force log-off all your apps and remote-wipe the device if your phone gets stolen. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 year ago Anything is possible with enough time. Which is why you force log-off all your apps and remote-wipe the device if your phone gets stolen. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 year ago Anything is possible with enough time. Which is why you force log-off all your apps and remote-wipe the device if your phone gets stolen. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] baatliwala@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago It's amazing how Americans love poking their nose into everyone else's affairs yet can be so oblivious. For some people a phone is literally the only device they have, they can't do anything else. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (5 children) How do you deal with 2fa? For capital one in particular, I don't believe there is an option not to use their app, and the other banks that I use are in the same boat or adamantly recommend to use their app. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 year ago* (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Kahizzle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago If their bank is anything like my bank, you NEED to have the mobile app installed to login with for online banking. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children) The standard for banks like capital one is, in order to login in a browser you must use their app 2fa, they do not support third party 2fa methods, and their app doesn't work under compatibility layers. That last part may come with a workaround, but my earlier point is that the normal end user wouldn't feel comfortable using such a thing if it is not officially allowed. They also claim you can use 2fa by SMS, but that is first and foremost wrong since it isn't an option for payment portals, and secondly insecure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago I guess it is a matter of semantics at this point, but i take the year of the Linux phone to be when a phone running a Linux os is viable for the masses, which as my original message states is at least 10 years out. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 year ago* (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Kahizzle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago If their bank is anything like my bank, you NEED to have the mobile app installed to login with for online banking. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children) The standard for banks like capital one is, in order to login in a browser you must use their app 2fa, they do not support third party 2fa methods, and their app doesn't work under compatibility layers. That last part may come with a workaround, but my earlier point is that the normal end user wouldn't feel comfortable using such a thing if it is not officially allowed. They also claim you can use 2fa by SMS, but that is first and foremost wrong since it isn't an option for payment portals, and secondly insecure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago I guess it is a matter of semantics at this point, but i take the year of the Linux phone to be when a phone running a Linux os is viable for the masses, which as my original message states is at least 10 years out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kahizzle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago If their bank is anything like my bank, you NEED to have the mobile app installed to login with for online banking. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children) The standard for banks like capital one is, in order to login in a browser you must use their app 2fa, they do not support third party 2fa methods, and their app doesn't work under compatibility layers. That last part may come with a workaround, but my earlier point is that the normal end user wouldn't feel comfortable using such a thing if it is not officially allowed. They also claim you can use 2fa by SMS, but that is first and foremost wrong since it isn't an option for payment portals, and secondly insecure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago I guess it is a matter of semantics at this point, but i take the year of the Linux phone to be when a phone running a Linux os is viable for the masses, which as my original message states is at least 10 years out. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago I guess it is a matter of semantics at this point, but i take the year of the Linux phone to be when a phone running a Linux os is viable for the masses, which as my original message states is at least 10 years out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago I guess it is a matter of semantics at this point, but i take the year of the Linux phone to be when a phone running a Linux os is viable for the masses, which as my original message states is at least 10 years out. permalink fedilink source parent