you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 1 year ago (7 children)

People also want food, clothes, electricity, entertainment, hobbies and vacations. Where is all this supposed to come if they don't work?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 30 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [+] 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Ok, so you're taking about the 1% hording all the wealth. I guess you're right. I remember some study listing what every person on earth could have in a sustainable world and it covered all the basic needs and more. For me the original tweet sounded like "people spend all their money on rent so with free housing they wouldn't have to work" which ignores all the other needs I listed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    George Jetson only worked 2 hours a week, and he could support a family of four plus a robot maid. Today's families have two people working two jobs with the same hours as 100 years ago, and they can't afford to buy a house.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Because billionaires exist. Literally, that's it. If you do the math and you distribute that out to everyone as their fair labor value, then yeah. People don't need to work much at all to make society function.

    Think about how much of your society is just advertising for some new bullshit finance scheme that only syphons money from the bottom up to the top? And they pay people to do it. An insane amount of the "work" done by people today does ABSOLUTELY nothing to benefit humanity. It's busywork to make rich people richer.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Fun fact: our economy is based on the work of John Maynard Keynes, who predicted the high growth would allow us a 15-hour work week by now. Guess where that time is going instead?

    It's a fun fact and not a sad fact because we still got the technology anyways, so we can still get there in a matter of years if society makes better choices.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Uhh, their job?? The social contract was supposed to be that the workers specialize into specific fields, in exchange for these things. If the owners can't support their end of the bargain, why should the workers give they're effort away? This IS the peaceful outcome, if the system really can't work that way what keeps the less-than-peaceful methods off the table?

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)