you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 26 points 1 year ago (16 children)

Christine Lemmer-Webber made an excellent blog post ~6 months ago titled How Decentralized is Bluesky really?

Give that a read.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [+] [S] -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    Well, if you have read it then your cherry picking of minor ways Bluesky is slighly less closed comes accross as pretty bad faith 🤷

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] [S] 3 points 1 year ago (11 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Lemmy.ml, lemmy.world, lemmy.zip and any other instance run on the same software

    Wafrn doesn't run the same software as Bluesky.social

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] [S] 0 points 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Good to hear!

    The main difference is still that every work put into Bluesky.social can not be reused by other "servers", unlike Lemmy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] [S] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [+] [S] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Sure seems like that's what you're doing. Notice how no one is against ATProto. Your post title is about BlueSky, not about ATProto.

    We don't care about the protocol, despite what you think. Your average Lemmy user isn't on a standards body. We care about the network it facilitates.

    Volunteers run the Fediverse, keeping it open. The former Twitter CEO runs BlyeSky. Want to start an actual open network running ATProto? Go for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)