▲ 108 ▼ Bluesky is more open than you think. (lemmy.dbzer0.com) submitted 1 year ago by irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/fediverse@lemmy.world 84 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] 3 points 1 year ago (11 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago (10 children) Lemmy.ml, lemmy.world, lemmy.zip and any other instance run on the same software Wafrn doesn't run the same software as Bluesky.social permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [+] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] 0 points 1 year ago (9 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) Good to hear! The main difference is still that every work put into Bluesky.social can not be reused by other "servers", unlike Lemmy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the Lemmy devs implement a feature, all Lemmy instances can update and get that feature. Based on what you are saying, the people behind atproto.africa have to implement their own alternative to the Bluesky appview (I guess because they can't reuse Bluesky.social code?) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) Still is. Always will be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago Most people who are for bluesky don't even care about an open internet or whatever, they just want their protocol to win or whatever. permalink fedilink source parent [–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sure seems like that's what you're doing. Notice how no one is against ATProto. Your post title is about BlueSky, not about ATProto. We don't care about the protocol, despite what you think. Your average Lemmy user isn't on a standards body. We care about the network it facilitates. Volunteers run the Fediverse, keeping it open. The former Twitter CEO runs BlyeSky. Want to start an actual open network running ATProto? Go for it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago (10 children) Lemmy.ml, lemmy.world, lemmy.zip and any other instance run on the same software Wafrn doesn't run the same software as Bluesky.social permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [+] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] 0 points 1 year ago (9 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) Good to hear! The main difference is still that every work put into Bluesky.social can not be reused by other "servers", unlike Lemmy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the Lemmy devs implement a feature, all Lemmy instances can update and get that feature. Based on what you are saying, the people behind atproto.africa have to implement their own alternative to the Bluesky appview (I guess because they can't reuse Bluesky.social code?) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) Still is. Always will be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago Most people who are for bluesky don't even care about an open internet or whatever, they just want their protocol to win or whatever. permalink fedilink source parent [–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sure seems like that's what you're doing. Notice how no one is against ATProto. Your post title is about BlueSky, not about ATProto. We don't care about the protocol, despite what you think. Your average Lemmy user isn't on a standards body. We care about the network it facilitates. Volunteers run the Fediverse, keeping it open. The former Twitter CEO runs BlyeSky. Want to start an actual open network running ATProto? Go for it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[+] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] 0 points 1 year ago (9 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) Good to hear! The main difference is still that every work put into Bluesky.social can not be reused by other "servers", unlike Lemmy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the Lemmy devs implement a feature, all Lemmy instances can update and get that feature. Based on what you are saying, the people behind atproto.africa have to implement their own alternative to the Bluesky appview (I guess because they can't reuse Bluesky.social code?) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) Still is. Always will be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago Most people who are for bluesky don't even care about an open internet or whatever, they just want their protocol to win or whatever. permalink fedilink source parent [–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sure seems like that's what you're doing. Notice how no one is against ATProto. Your post title is about BlueSky, not about ATProto. We don't care about the protocol, despite what you think. Your average Lemmy user isn't on a standards body. We care about the network it facilitates. Volunteers run the Fediverse, keeping it open. The former Twitter CEO runs BlyeSky. Want to start an actual open network running ATProto? Go for it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) Good to hear! The main difference is still that every work put into Bluesky.social can not be reused by other "servers", unlike Lemmy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the Lemmy devs implement a feature, all Lemmy instances can update and get that feature. Based on what you are saying, the people behind atproto.africa have to implement their own alternative to the Bluesky appview (I guess because they can't reuse Bluesky.social code?) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[+] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the Lemmy devs implement a feature, all Lemmy instances can update and get that feature. Based on what you are saying, the people behind atproto.africa have to implement their own alternative to the Bluesky appview (I guess because they can't reuse Bluesky.social code?) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) If the Lemmy devs implement a feature, all Lemmy instances can update and get that feature. Based on what you are saying, the people behind atproto.africa have to implement their own alternative to the Bluesky appview (I guess because they can't reuse Bluesky.social code?) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 1 year ago (4 children) Still is. Always will be. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago Most people who are for bluesky don't even care about an open internet or whatever, they just want their protocol to win or whatever. permalink fedilink source parent [–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sure seems like that's what you're doing. Notice how no one is against ATProto. Your post title is about BlueSky, not about ATProto. We don't care about the protocol, despite what you think. Your average Lemmy user isn't on a standards body. We care about the network it facilitates. Volunteers run the Fediverse, keeping it open. The former Twitter CEO runs BlyeSky. Want to start an actual open network running ATProto? Go for it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[+] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com [S] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago Most people who are for bluesky don't even care about an open internet or whatever, they just want their protocol to win or whatever. permalink fedilink source parent [–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sure seems like that's what you're doing. Notice how no one is against ATProto. Your post title is about BlueSky, not about ATProto. We don't care about the protocol, despite what you think. Your average Lemmy user isn't on a standards body. We care about the network it facilitates. Volunteers run the Fediverse, keeping it open. The former Twitter CEO runs BlyeSky. Want to start an actual open network running ATProto? Go for it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago Most people who are for bluesky don't even care about an open internet or whatever, they just want their protocol to win or whatever. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Sure seems like that's what you're doing. Notice how no one is against ATProto. Your post title is about BlueSky, not about ATProto. We don't care about the protocol, despite what you think. Your average Lemmy user isn't on a standards body. We care about the network it facilitates. Volunteers run the Fediverse, keeping it open. The former Twitter CEO runs BlyeSky. Want to start an actual open network running ATProto? Go for it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)