▲ 22 ▼ Humans will never go past Mars (ghostofcarnot.substack.com) submitted 1 year ago by ghostofcarnot@futurology.today to c/futurology@futurology.today 34 comments fedilink hide all child comments Space is really spread out, and we will forever lack the means to get around it fast. Space also happens to be highly inhospitable to human life. For these reasons, I submit that no human will ever go farther than Mars.
[–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago (9 children) give it 200-1000 years permalink fedilink source hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 8 points 1 year ago* (8 children) If we can’t figure out global warming and frequent wars, there’s no way we’ll make it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (7 children) As far as war, as we make it unprofitable that should help permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 2 points 1 year ago (6 children) Could we make a global treaty that says wars are illegal? If you start a war, the rest of the world will boycott you for 100 years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) because collective punishment has worked so well thus far? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Option B: Those who violate the treaty get chocolate pudding for dessert. Can you come up with a better solution? It’s not a high bar to clear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 3 points 1 year ago anyone capable of starting a war will be dead 100 years later, you are quite literally talking about punishing people who had nothing to do with it. solution: Abolish the nation state and anyone who isn't involved gets chocolate pudding for dessert. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Treaties and boycotts are uses of power. But power corrupts due to the survival of the selfish. Break the wheel! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) That is true. Well, I’m out of options. As long as humans are greedy and arrogant, there’s no clean way to solve this problem. All of my ideas involve using power one way or another. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago What if there was a technology that publishes the face of any murderer? (including soldiers) and bans them from my social network Or a technology that allows a refugee to trade in everything they own and set up elsewhere without their livelihood being stolen? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 8 points 1 year ago* (8 children) If we can’t figure out global warming and frequent wars, there’s no way we’ll make it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (7 children) As far as war, as we make it unprofitable that should help permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 2 points 1 year ago (6 children) Could we make a global treaty that says wars are illegal? If you start a war, the rest of the world will boycott you for 100 years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) because collective punishment has worked so well thus far? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Option B: Those who violate the treaty get chocolate pudding for dessert. Can you come up with a better solution? It’s not a high bar to clear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 3 points 1 year ago anyone capable of starting a war will be dead 100 years later, you are quite literally talking about punishing people who had nothing to do with it. solution: Abolish the nation state and anyone who isn't involved gets chocolate pudding for dessert. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Treaties and boycotts are uses of power. But power corrupts due to the survival of the selfish. Break the wheel! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) That is true. Well, I’m out of options. As long as humans are greedy and arrogant, there’s no clean way to solve this problem. All of my ideas involve using power one way or another. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago What if there was a technology that publishes the face of any murderer? (including soldiers) and bans them from my social network Or a technology that allows a refugee to trade in everything they own and set up elsewhere without their livelihood being stolen? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (7 children) As far as war, as we make it unprofitable that should help permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 2 points 1 year ago (6 children) Could we make a global treaty that says wars are illegal? If you start a war, the rest of the world will boycott you for 100 years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) because collective punishment has worked so well thus far? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Option B: Those who violate the treaty get chocolate pudding for dessert. Can you come up with a better solution? It’s not a high bar to clear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 3 points 1 year ago anyone capable of starting a war will be dead 100 years later, you are quite literally talking about punishing people who had nothing to do with it. solution: Abolish the nation state and anyone who isn't involved gets chocolate pudding for dessert. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Treaties and boycotts are uses of power. But power corrupts due to the survival of the selfish. Break the wheel! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) That is true. Well, I’m out of options. As long as humans are greedy and arrogant, there’s no clean way to solve this problem. All of my ideas involve using power one way or another. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago What if there was a technology that publishes the face of any murderer? (including soldiers) and bans them from my social network Or a technology that allows a refugee to trade in everything they own and set up elsewhere without their livelihood being stolen? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 2 points 1 year ago (6 children) Could we make a global treaty that says wars are illegal? If you start a war, the rest of the world will boycott you for 100 years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) because collective punishment has worked so well thus far? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Option B: Those who violate the treaty get chocolate pudding for dessert. Can you come up with a better solution? It’s not a high bar to clear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 3 points 1 year ago anyone capable of starting a war will be dead 100 years later, you are quite literally talking about punishing people who had nothing to do with it. solution: Abolish the nation state and anyone who isn't involved gets chocolate pudding for dessert. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Treaties and boycotts are uses of power. But power corrupts due to the survival of the selfish. Break the wheel! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) That is true. Well, I’m out of options. As long as humans are greedy and arrogant, there’s no clean way to solve this problem. All of my ideas involve using power one way or another. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago What if there was a technology that publishes the face of any murderer? (including soldiers) and bans them from my social network Or a technology that allows a refugee to trade in everything they own and set up elsewhere without their livelihood being stolen? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) because collective punishment has worked so well thus far? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Option B: Those who violate the treaty get chocolate pudding for dessert. Can you come up with a better solution? It’s not a high bar to clear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 3 points 1 year ago anyone capable of starting a war will be dead 100 years later, you are quite literally talking about punishing people who had nothing to do with it. solution: Abolish the nation state and anyone who isn't involved gets chocolate pudding for dessert. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Option B: Those who violate the treaty get chocolate pudding for dessert. Can you come up with a better solution? It’s not a high bar to clear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 3 points 1 year ago anyone capable of starting a war will be dead 100 years later, you are quite literally talking about punishing people who had nothing to do with it. solution: Abolish the nation state and anyone who isn't involved gets chocolate pudding for dessert. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 3 points 1 year ago anyone capable of starting a war will be dead 100 years later, you are quite literally talking about punishing people who had nothing to do with it. solution: Abolish the nation state and anyone who isn't involved gets chocolate pudding for dessert. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Treaties and boycotts are uses of power. But power corrupts due to the survival of the selfish. Break the wheel! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) That is true. Well, I’m out of options. As long as humans are greedy and arrogant, there’s no clean way to solve this problem. All of my ideas involve using power one way or another. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago What if there was a technology that publishes the face of any murderer? (including soldiers) and bans them from my social network Or a technology that allows a refugee to trade in everything they own and set up elsewhere without their livelihood being stolen? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) That is true. Well, I’m out of options. As long as humans are greedy and arrogant, there’s no clean way to solve this problem. All of my ideas involve using power one way or another. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago What if there was a technology that publishes the face of any murderer? (including soldiers) and bans them from my social network Or a technology that allows a refugee to trade in everything they own and set up elsewhere without their livelihood being stolen? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago What if there was a technology that publishes the face of any murderer? (including soldiers) and bans them from my social network Or a technology that allows a refugee to trade in everything they own and set up elsewhere without their livelihood being stolen? permalink fedilink source parent