A Virginia couple, Charles and Judith Voorhees, filed an emergency motion in federal court on Thursday, seeking to halt the project, alleging that it violates multiple federal preservation and planning laws.

The Voorhees lawsuit seeking to halt the project argues that Trump bypassed laws meant to protect national landmarks and public transparency.

At stake is whether a sitting president can unilaterally alter one of the country’s most symbolically important buildings, or whether the "People’s House" must remain subject to the same review and accountability standards that govern other federal projects.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 35 points 1 year ago (4 children)

No they ruled that a president can't do crimes

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    ...if the act is relevant to performing his role as president.

    Still fucked up, but nothing about this was required to perform his role.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    "In order to grift harder and accept more donations from the middle east, I needed to build a ballroom we could dance with young girls together in where the filthy common folk couldn't see. It's really just for work. You should thank me"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Building a monument to his best mate Epstein will help him in his daily duties ...of eating hamberders, golfing, sex trafficking kids, and planning the demise of his enemies (real, or perceived).

  • source
  • parent