you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 1 year ago (9 children)

You still need a software engineer to review the code. It's naive to think that randomly generated code will work, and by "work" i mean not just do what it's supposed to, but also handle edge cases and be secure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    If you think it's random, you don't understand LLMs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    So, in your learned opinion, it's deterministic?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    You sent me down a bit of a rabbit hole, but it turned up an interesting answer. Turns out they are nondeterministic, and why they aren't deterministic is still an open question https://thinkingmachines.ai/blog/defeating-nondeterminism-in-llm-inference/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    And you are perfectly deterministic? Because if you aren't, by your own dichotomic logic, you're random too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments