you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Yes, they just have to "run it at a loss". Instead of trying to drive up the fares trying to reach "profitable" levels.

A lot of the savings should come from reduced road deterioration and lower road maintenance costs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    And smaller roads. The routes that are ideal for trains already have the overloaded highways that are already too big to maintain rain and cant scale to traffic: just one more lane, bro?

  • source
  • parent