Selfhosted

63,723 readers

5,179 active

712 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.
AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

moderation log

moderators

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

Why is Unraid popular in the self-hosting community ? (jlai.lu)

submitted 1 year ago by KaKi87@jlai.lu to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

62 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It's proprietary, after all. I understand paid is fine, but even then, it usually better be open source.

So, why is Unraid an exception ?

Thanks

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

Mergerfs can do that too and you can keep the underlying fs as whatever you want.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

It has no parity, you can pair with snapraid but thats snapshot parity and not real-time parity. Depends on the use case if that would work or not.

Also no caching options.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

Valid points. I use it for my media collection I can easily restore and won't miss. Cache would be sort of nice to have and redundancy would just be wasting space.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 year ago

Yeah media is a good use case for it, and doesnt really need cache either.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent