That's all fine and dandy there, Kyle. But have you ever tried doing real science as taught by the "The Institute for Creation Science"? They have so called journal articles and are definitely doing real Science, it's right in the name. You just need to adjust your definitions of "Science" and "Scientific Journal" and "facts". I am definitely trusting people who took bus loads of drugs or were dropped on their heads as babies to provide us with sound scientific information.

I was maintenance at a marine bio lab, made friends with the techs who work for the senior research scientists. They're made to create results in a clients favor all the time. In my experience it's treated as gross but normal, like an old man hanging out naked in the locker room. You don't get more grants if you prevent the client from doing what they want. It really put a tinge on my perspective of "commercial science". Even the government funded stuff came with "stipulations" of the results they wanted pretty often.

I've also dealt with this! Clients loved asking me to lie to the EPA directly. Now that I'm doing medical R&D testing, every so often we'll have to remind an engineer that "no, we can't just do more testing and average the results."

and also peer reviewed research needs to be replicated to verify that it works too. they are probably going to look for an old study, or something, or even a blog to back up thier claims.

Manufacturing Results is the main mode of operation of Think Tanks.