you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

They charge extra for theming that people could get themselves for free. I don’t like that it’s taking advantage of vulnerable people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I don’t think that’s “taking advantage of vulnerable people”

    The options still exist for people to learn and theming is incredibly inconsequential.

    They’re monetising to support development in a minimally impactful way, that is completely optional, and I think that’s a good thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    They should advertise that everything is free and can be installed after installation if you choose not say $80 gets you a Windows like desktop and software replacements that will save you thousands (Blender/Xournal++/OfficeSuite)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The value proposition is ease of use and integration of these theming utilities.

    I honestly think this monetisation strategy of theirs is a non-issue.

    People who want a streamlined experience have the option of paying for that, people who want the option of doing it all themselves have that opportunity too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    My problem is them not communicating that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Not communicating that there are alternatives to their services?

    I don’t really think it’s their responsibility to spoon feed alternatives to their customers; they’re not being anticompetitive, they’re not being deceptive, they’re not blocking alternatives.

    I think your requirements here are unfair and kind of irrational

  • source
  • parent