3
Shiftall Announces MeganeX 8K Mark II Shipping in December for $1,900 (en.shiftall.net)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/virtualreality@lemmy.world
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The MeganeX 8K Mark II is a super-lightweight, ultra-high-resolution VR headset equipped with 4K micro OLED panels per eye and compatible with SteamVR™ tracking. This unique combination ensures unparalleled lightness and comfort, making it a top choice for VR enthusiasts. The 10-bit HDR-compatible 4K resolution micro OLED panels, driven at 90Hz, and the pancake lenses, newly designed by Panasonic Group, deliver deep blacks, exceptional color reproduction, and an immersive, world-class VR visual experience.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I think somehow people still haven't figured out the two important things the Meta Quest so popular despite its many, many inherent drawbacks.

Why is the Quest relevant here? This is obviously not competing with the Quest, and the reality is a company like Shiftall can't compete with Meta in terms of price because they don't have billions to burn like Meta. Making a Quest clone seems like a major waste of time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    If it exists in the consumer VR space, it's competing with the Quest whether we like it or not.

    But the Quest is a fully self contained device in the sense that you can take it out of the box and use it as-is, without requiring the purchase of any external bullshit, and you can use it anywhere without having to string said external bullshit all the place to make your play space permanent. Those are the two big important factors.

    Never mind the delta in price between a thoroughly entry level versus a high end VR rig. I don't think many of us (i.e. nerds) would care too much if a really good PCVR solution cost north of $1000 provided it did everything it said it did without a hassle attached. But for fuck's sake, at this price point they could at least deign to include a basic set of lighthouses and a pair of OG Vive controllers in the box or something.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    not directly, devices have different use cases. the quest while having good optics has a lower resolution and lower stereo overlap, it's impossible to connect to pc without extra latency or compression artifacts, lower refresh rate. For a sim racer using a dedicated rig replacing batteries is a negative as well as the other drawbacks mentioned.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I think the fact that the only companies with good standalone tracking solutions are the ones who can burn billions on R&D (Meta and Apple) is telling of how difficult of a problem it is.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    It seems like a pretty solved problem to me, being the owner of a Reverb G2 myself. There's also the Vive Focus models, Pimax, Pico, and probably tons of others I can't think of offhand.

    Even so. $1900. No base stations in the box. Come on.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    @Supreme @dual_sport_dork i'm not even sure if lighthouse-based vr setups still relevant in 2025. Yes, it's still good for enthusiasts, but it's expensive and poor for consumer's usage comparing to standalones. And it's even not open-hardware, so it's not even good for opensource enthusiasts

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •