▲ 209 ▼ Lemmy libs: "But stalin baddd mkayyy" (lemmy.ml) submitted 1 year ago by jackeroni@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml 47 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) True, and yes unfortunately on Marxist theory and commentary. Part of why I'm a disillusioned corporatist if I still count as one and not an outright socialist. What can I say, Marx makes good arguments for economies of scale. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Mostly, a misguided attachment to libertarianism, and a lack of faith in a successful global proletariat revolution. Thus why in the original comment I clarified "tankie"; the other bit? The American feds. Real Red-scare vibes over here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You know, that's a valid question I've been asking myself lately due to the intersection between American Union history and the current state of politics. Frankly, contribute to the local orgs already; so as I said, arguing I'm not under the umbrella isn't strictly valid. The other bit being that you can loop folks further left out of the more extreme sections of the evangelical right by presenting yourself as a middle ground. Talk them into reading some libertarian theory, conservative theory, and to read Marx and Engels for comparative analysis. Or at worst, reduce the theory to memes and make them read it by cutting absurd bits. I'm a bit of a dadaism fan if it wasn't obvious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago True; frankly, it usually works. I may have just read too much philosophy and feel crappy feeling like I'm telling people what they oughta believe. Still, this was a delightful discussion. Have a lovely day in case I pass out (night shift). permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) True, and yes unfortunately on Marxist theory and commentary. Part of why I'm a disillusioned corporatist if I still count as one and not an outright socialist. What can I say, Marx makes good arguments for economies of scale. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Mostly, a misguided attachment to libertarianism, and a lack of faith in a successful global proletariat revolution. Thus why in the original comment I clarified "tankie"; the other bit? The American feds. Real Red-scare vibes over here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You know, that's a valid question I've been asking myself lately due to the intersection between American Union history and the current state of politics. Frankly, contribute to the local orgs already; so as I said, arguing I'm not under the umbrella isn't strictly valid. The other bit being that you can loop folks further left out of the more extreme sections of the evangelical right by presenting yourself as a middle ground. Talk them into reading some libertarian theory, conservative theory, and to read Marx and Engels for comparative analysis. Or at worst, reduce the theory to memes and make them read it by cutting absurd bits. I'm a bit of a dadaism fan if it wasn't obvious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago True; frankly, it usually works. I may have just read too much philosophy and feel crappy feeling like I'm telling people what they oughta believe. Still, this was a delightful discussion. Have a lovely day in case I pass out (night shift). permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Mostly, a misguided attachment to libertarianism, and a lack of faith in a successful global proletariat revolution. Thus why in the original comment I clarified "tankie"; the other bit? The American feds. Real Red-scare vibes over here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You know, that's a valid question I've been asking myself lately due to the intersection between American Union history and the current state of politics. Frankly, contribute to the local orgs already; so as I said, arguing I'm not under the umbrella isn't strictly valid. The other bit being that you can loop folks further left out of the more extreme sections of the evangelical right by presenting yourself as a middle ground. Talk them into reading some libertarian theory, conservative theory, and to read Marx and Engels for comparative analysis. Or at worst, reduce the theory to memes and make them read it by cutting absurd bits. I'm a bit of a dadaism fan if it wasn't obvious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago True; frankly, it usually works. I may have just read too much philosophy and feel crappy feeling like I'm telling people what they oughta believe. Still, this was a delightful discussion. Have a lovely day in case I pass out (night shift). permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Mostly, a misguided attachment to libertarianism, and a lack of faith in a successful global proletariat revolution. Thus why in the original comment I clarified "tankie"; the other bit? The American feds. Real Red-scare vibes over here. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You know, that's a valid question I've been asking myself lately due to the intersection between American Union history and the current state of politics. Frankly, contribute to the local orgs already; so as I said, arguing I'm not under the umbrella isn't strictly valid. The other bit being that you can loop folks further left out of the more extreme sections of the evangelical right by presenting yourself as a middle ground. Talk them into reading some libertarian theory, conservative theory, and to read Marx and Engels for comparative analysis. Or at worst, reduce the theory to memes and make them read it by cutting absurd bits. I'm a bit of a dadaism fan if it wasn't obvious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago True; frankly, it usually works. I may have just read too much philosophy and feel crappy feeling like I'm telling people what they oughta believe. Still, this was a delightful discussion. Have a lovely day in case I pass out (night shift). permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You know, that's a valid question I've been asking myself lately due to the intersection between American Union history and the current state of politics. Frankly, contribute to the local orgs already; so as I said, arguing I'm not under the umbrella isn't strictly valid. The other bit being that you can loop folks further left out of the more extreme sections of the evangelical right by presenting yourself as a middle ground. Talk them into reading some libertarian theory, conservative theory, and to read Marx and Engels for comparative analysis. Or at worst, reduce the theory to memes and make them read it by cutting absurd bits. I'm a bit of a dadaism fan if it wasn't obvious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago True; frankly, it usually works. I may have just read too much philosophy and feel crappy feeling like I'm telling people what they oughta believe. Still, this was a delightful discussion. Have a lovely day in case I pass out (night shift). permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You know, that's a valid question I've been asking myself lately due to the intersection between American Union history and the current state of politics. Frankly, contribute to the local orgs already; so as I said, arguing I'm not under the umbrella isn't strictly valid. The other bit being that you can loop folks further left out of the more extreme sections of the evangelical right by presenting yourself as a middle ground. Talk them into reading some libertarian theory, conservative theory, and to read Marx and Engels for comparative analysis. Or at worst, reduce the theory to memes and make them read it by cutting absurd bits. I'm a bit of a dadaism fan if it wasn't obvious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago True; frankly, it usually works. I may have just read too much philosophy and feel crappy feeling like I'm telling people what they oughta believe. Still, this was a delightful discussion. Have a lovely day in case I pass out (night shift). permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago True; frankly, it usually works. I may have just read too much philosophy and feel crappy feeling like I'm telling people what they oughta believe. Still, this was a delightful discussion. Have a lovely day in case I pass out (night shift). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago True; frankly, it usually works. I may have just read too much philosophy and feel crappy feeling like I'm telling people what they oughta believe. Still, this was a delightful discussion. Have a lovely day in case I pass out (night shift). permalink fedilink source parent