225
The Most Efficient Traveler Isn’t a Bird or a Fish—It’s You on a Bike (www.scientificamerican.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
43 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Non paywalled version

https://archive.md/wZytx

Turns out a car is particularly inefficient.. Who knew /s

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Humans aren’t very efficient movers.

Now that's bullshit. Efficient walking is literally one of the few things we're best at. Chasing prey to exhaustion is a hunting method we are made for.

Edit: right, movers, not walkers.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Compared to other things that walk, yes. Muscle efficiency is gutter tier shit in general. Internal combustion engines look good in comparison, and no, I'm not joking.

    This is why e-bikes are the most efficient form of travel in terms of calories burned per km. Batteries and electric motors are about as efficient as anything can be, and it's better when they're not pushing around a large metal box.

    In terms of lifetime CO2 output, though, they never quite catch up to regular bikes due to the extra manufacturing needs. It's not a huge difference, though; if an e-bike is what gets people out of a car, that's a massive win.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent