you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 66 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Is the purpose of human intimacy procreation?

If no, then why can't we have intimacy without the unnecessary outcome of the propagation of our species?

If yes, should we require that every relationship between man and woman result in offspring? But we don't, do we?

So, if we have the personal freedom to choose whether our relationships result in progeny and if there is more to intimacy than procreation, why are you so afraid of non-heterosexual relationships?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    If yes, should we require every relationship between man and woman to result in offspring?

    The people that care about this will answer yes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The people that care about this will get divorced if one of them is infertile.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Two people that have a fully transmissable genetic conditon (which has caused them immense suffering) choose to share sexual intimacy without procreating (so as to not propogate that suffering). Should they be deprived of that intimacy (which acts as a reprieve from their suffering) simply because they choose not to create a new person who will also inevitably have to suffer?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)