▲ 40 ▼ RUMOR: 'The Future of Xbox is Software Publishing' as Next Console Generation Faces Doubts (insider-gaming.com) submitted 1 year ago by EveningPancakes@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/gaming@beehaw.org 17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 year ago (3 children) Remember how much money they wasted on Kinect? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) That peripheral was ahead of its time. Release it via Nintendo today with some Fortnite skins and a stupid name and it would sell like hotcakes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) The tech was great, but they alienated everyone by making it compulsory at the start and trying to shoe horn its adoption. Agree that Nintendo could get away with it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago They should have marketed it as a peripheral and not a gaming controller. That (gaming) should have been a bonus for people to discover. The failure of this device was in the marketing. The Internet decided it wasn’t “cool” and they couldn’t recover. That device is still used by multiple industries to this day. I think the online backlash against this device was my realization that I despise the unnecessarily negative internet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) That peripheral was ahead of its time. Release it via Nintendo today with some Fortnite skins and a stupid name and it would sell like hotcakes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) The tech was great, but they alienated everyone by making it compulsory at the start and trying to shoe horn its adoption. Agree that Nintendo could get away with it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago They should have marketed it as a peripheral and not a gaming controller. That (gaming) should have been a bonus for people to discover. The failure of this device was in the marketing. The Internet decided it wasn’t “cool” and they couldn’t recover. That device is still used by multiple industries to this day. I think the online backlash against this device was my realization that I despise the unnecessarily negative internet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) The tech was great, but they alienated everyone by making it compulsory at the start and trying to shoe horn its adoption. Agree that Nintendo could get away with it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago They should have marketed it as a peripheral and not a gaming controller. That (gaming) should have been a bonus for people to discover. The failure of this device was in the marketing. The Internet decided it wasn’t “cool” and they couldn’t recover. That device is still used by multiple industries to this day. I think the online backlash against this device was my realization that I despise the unnecessarily negative internet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago They should have marketed it as a peripheral and not a gaming controller. That (gaming) should have been a bonus for people to discover. The failure of this device was in the marketing. The Internet decided it wasn’t “cool” and they couldn’t recover. That device is still used by multiple industries to this day. I think the online backlash against this device was my realization that I despise the unnecessarily negative internet. permalink fedilink source parent