you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 60 points 1 year ago (4 children)

As someone who deals with data visualization for a living, I mostly agree. But also, it's fine to do this as long as you have some sort of visual indicator to show that the data continues down to 0 as opposed to leaving it like it is in the chart above. If you need to be able to show the details in the data that is present higher up, removing the extra numbers where data isn't present is a good way to do so. But again, you need some kind of indication that you have done so or you're just being deceiving.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Heights are potentially a good example of that. Iirc, the standard deviation of height is only about 3 inches (for women), so doing the full y-axis would make small differences between groups impossible to visually compare.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)