you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 70 points 1 year ago (7 children)

With this and Google stopping side loading in Android, I’m going to be looking hard into Linux phones.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -47 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 50 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Could the EFF or individuals sponsor apps from devs who refuse to identify to Big Goog?

    Dev sends EFF the source code,

    EFF registers with Google,

    EFF submits the app,

    Everybody’s happy except a number of people for obvious reasons but at least the app’s verified

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • That sounds like just changing who is verifying the developer. Whether it's the EFF (because they aren't going to put their name and reputation at risk for unreviewed source code) or google, the issue is the same.

    Someone has to be the middle man in deciding what is allowed to be installed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    Sorry, you're well out of the loop on this one, boss. Sideloading has been common practice for thousands? millions? of users since the beginning of android. There are plenty of apps not listed on Google Play - the ones that come top mind are Fortnight for a time and now the Epic Games Store app, and some VPN apps that couldn't offer features like ad/malware blocking in their Play store versions. Sideloading means downloading an executable install file (an .APK file in this case) rather than installing from Google Play. And they are SEVERELY limiting this ability next year.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I don't think people got your point. I assume you meant that people aren't "sideloading" in android yet, because you just download an APK file and install it. Same as installing an EXE file in windows outside of the Microsoft Store is not called "sideloading" either.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)