you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 1 year ago (8 children)

The best scenario we can hope for is for generals to simply refuse an illegal order, and when told to retire, refuse, and when reassigned to also refuse on the grounds that it's illegal punishment for refusing an illegal order.

Anything more and you're in coup territory, which sets the precedent that the military can step in and "correct" civilian government when it's wrong in their view. See, for example, Myanmar. Even after the military relinquished control to allow democracy, they still decided to "correct" that democracy when it started to drift from their wishes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Myanmar is a bit different. It was under constant control of the military and families connect to it (which also got extremely rich through corruption).

    They switched to "democracy" to get sanctions lifted, but they still controlled what government did. Once people voted on a bill that would remove their power and turn Myanmar to true democracy, that's when they stepped in and took control back to prevent it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    These generals have been doing war crimes for decades for money. You think they will stop taking orders when they tell them to turn their guns on you? These soulless fucks execute orders as told, and would gladly kill you for a promotion

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment