Welcome to /c/Tumblr

All the chaos of Tumblr, without actually going to Tumblr.

Rule 1: Be Civil, Not Cursed

This isn’t your personal call-out post.

No harassment, dogpiling, or brigading
No bigotry (transphobia, racism, sexism, etc.)
Keep it fun and weird, not mean-spirited

Rule 2: No Forbidden Posts

Some things belong in the drafts forever. That means:

No spam or scams
No porn or sexually explicit content
No illegal content (don’t make this a federal case)
NSFW screenshots must be properly tagged

If you see a post that breaks the rules, report it so the mods can handle it. Otherwise just reblog and relax.

founded 1 year ago

moderators

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not sure what part doesn't make sense about the original

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

have your cake and eat it too

Alone it sounds normal but doesnt make sense in context because its supposed to be

eat your cake and have it too

Because the idiom is supposed to mean that you can't eat it and somehow still have it. The first implies you got cake and then were unable to eat it which doesnt make sense because thats literally the point of cake

Wikipedia:

you cannot enjoy two incompatible things at the same time; once you eat the cake, you no longer have it. It highlights the idea of trade-offs or making choices in life.

Apparently have is supposed to be synonymous with "keep" but language has evolved

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It can sound misleading but the second part doesn't actually mean the "having" at the first part has ended. It's not incorrect, it's just more confusing than the other way around.

I wouldn't say the language has changed. You either have something or don't. If you eat your cake you don't have it anymore

permalink

fedilink

source

parent